It’s time for our monthly mailbag, and we’ve gotten lots of excellent questions. I’ll answer some today and more on Tuesday. Questions are edited for length and clarity.
Question: Why are Major League Baseball management and the Players Union so stubborn about the issues that prevent them from reaching a fair and equitable Collective Bargaining Agreement? It seems to me it is in everyone’s best interest to put their egos in their pocket, make some compromises, and “play ball.” What glory is there in holding out for the last buck, if the result is that there are no bucks in anyone’s pocket, because there is no season? Grow up gentlemen! From: Cathryn Girard
Answer: This was a popular question. Greg K wants to know what the main sticking points are. @Bmore_history wants to know if the lockout will delay Opening Day.
Cathryn, players and owners are very competitive, and that’s why they’ve been successful, but sometimes that can be a detriment. Obviously, you and I could quickly agree on a compromise, and it’s frustrating that the players and owners haven’t been able to find one yet.
Greg, the major complaint the players have is that with the game getting younger, they want to see the younger players get paid earlier in their career. They’d like to see the timetable for free agency, which is six years, and arbitration, which is three, shortened. They’d also like to see teams forced to spend more on players, a salary floor, but they don’t want a salary cap. They’d also like to see teams like the Orioles, who have had poor records in the last four seasons, not be rewarded with high draft picks for consistent losing records.
I don’t think Opening Day will be impacted.
Question: Have plans to visit spring training for the first time ever this year. Not happening is it? From: Jeffrey Walter via Facebook
Answer: Not so fast, Jeffrey. There will be spring training, but it could be truncated. It’s possible there could be a three- or four-week spring training instead of a six-week one. We should know more in two or three weeks.
Question: There has been a lot of talk about adjusting the baseball draft process because of perceived tanking by some major league teams. Is there validity to this perception? What would the proposed draft process look like? From: Mike T, Phoenix, Arizona via email
Answer: Mike, many people think that losing is rewarded with the current system, and the Orioles have benefited from it. I think it would be a good idea to take away a possible incentive for losing, and I’d like to see a draft lottery, like the NBA has, for all the teams that don’t qualify for the playoffs.
I’m confident there will be a change to the draft system that prevents teams that have chosen in the top five in consecutive years from choosing there repeatedly.
Question: What is the situation for scouting, recruiting of Cuban players? Do they have to defect first? Is there an underground railroad? Or is the Cuban government now somewhat cooperative, presumably for a fee? From: Will Miranda via BaltimoreBaseball.com comments
Answer: Will, the United States and Cuba don’t have diplomatic relations, so players must defect if they want to play in the major leagues. They have gone to Haiti, Mexico and elsewhere, and then the courting and signing process begins.
Question: What do you think the starting rotation for the Orioles will be in 2022? Is a trade possible? From: @SJ69569741
Answer: I also have a question from @JTP1224 asking about the starting rotation in 2023. Let’s put John Means and Jordan Lyles in the starting rotation to begin this season, and let’s add Bruce Zimmermann. You may choose two from the following: Keegan Akin, Mike Baumann, Dean Kremer, Zac Lowther and Alexander Wells. A trade is possible, and so is another free-agent signing.
By Opening Day 2023, DL Hall and Grayson Rodriguez should be in the starting rotation. By then, Kyle Bradish, Kyle Brnovich, Drew Rom and Kevin Smith could be candidates to join them.
Question: Any chance Matt Harvey re-signs? What would it take in a trade offer to get a true number 1 or number 2 starter from another organization? From: Paul Sullivan via email
Answer: Paul, re-signing Matt Harvey to a minor league contract wouldn’t shock me, but it doesn’t seem as if it’s at the top of the Orioles to-do list when the lockout ends.
I think the cost to trade for a top-of-the-rotation starter would be prohibitive. I think next offseason is more likely to see a trade than the short time between when the lockout ends and spring training begins.
Question: Who do you think will be playing the four infield positions in 2024? From: Folsom Boroughs via Facebook
Answer: All right, Folsom, let’s take a crack at it. How about Ryan Mountcastle at first, Connor Norby at second, Gunnar Henderson at shortstop and Jordan Westburg at third?
The Orioles haven’t decided whether Henderson and Westburg fit best at shortstop or third, so please ask me again next year.
Question: The Orioles need pitching. Does an outfielder get traded this year for an arm? If so, who’s the first to go? From: Robert William Kostkowski via Facebook
Answer: Robert, I think the most likely outfielder to get traded would be Anthony Santander. The Orioles would like to see Yusniel Diaz, if healthy and productive, and Kyle Stowers get a shot at the outfield.
If Santander is healthy and productive in the first half of 2022, then perhaps he’s a trade chip.
Question: What happens after two general managers agree on a trade? What are the rules for making a verbal agreement permanent and what variables allow a trade to be voided? From: Steve Cohen via email
Answer: Steve, every transaction must be approved by Major League Baseball. Most transactions are routine, but two ways that can raise a red flag are if a team trading a player is paying a huge amount of the remaining costs of a player’s contract or if a player is found to be injured.
Generally, most teams look at physicals before formalizing a deal, but sometimes an issue occurs after that.
Question: Wouldn’t you think at least some players — whether free agents, international players or otherwise — would want to sign with the Orioles because they’d have a high likelihood of making it? … The old “no place to go but up” idea. From: Bob Stier via email
Answer: Bob, as Buck Showalter liked to say, the Orioles couldn’t necessarily outbid other teams, but they could “outopportunity” them.
Some free agents, including shortstop Freddy Galvis last year, spoke of the opportunity to get playing time as a reason they signed with them. I think it’s truer for position players than pitchers.
Question: Hey Rich, do you know if Dean Kremer or Tanner Scott had any special offseason training or tutoring? Two talented arms I hope we can count on next season. Also, any chance of a better looking spring training ball cap? From: @briski715
Answer: Brian, Because of the lockout, news about players’ offseason coaching and workouts is scarce. I have no idea what the spring training cap will look like. I just hope spring training begins on time.
The Orioles completed their 2025 coaching staff by bringing back a former player and adding…
Question: What do you think of the Orioles trying to re-sign Austin Hays as a…
Presuming that free agent Anthony Santander signs elsewhere, the Orioles need to replace him. It’s…
It’s been a busy few weeks for Orioles executive vice president/general manager Mike Elias, and…
For the second time in a month, the Orioles cut ties with one of their…
The Orioles offered 2025 contracts to 11 players eligible for arbitration, agreed on a 2025…
View Comments
New to Baltimore Baseball, but a lifetime Orioles fan. What are your thoughts on the left field fence being moved back 30 ft? I think it should have been moved back years ago. Maybe, hopefully, it would attract better free agent pitchers to the Orioles.
Welcome, Birdie 23!
I think it’s a good move, and my sense is that fans are supportive of it. You can read more about it here later today.
My problem with moving back the fences is that will cost HR’s for the Orioles as well and we have a hard enough time scoring as it is. Plus, with our pitching, might not cost many HR’s for other teams either.
Thanks for answering my question. I feel that a salary floor needs to be implemented. I think I saw the Pirates Team salary was at $39MM! Why even have a team when others are spending $200MM+? Once in a Blue Moon lightning strikes and a lower tier team is competitive, but otherwise it just causes frustration with the fan base.
Thanks for answering questions. I’d like to hope Mayo is in there too for 2024. Maybe DH, 3B rotation. 2024 OFs? Mullins, Cowser, Kjerstad, Stowers, Hays? According to Callis, teams with #1 farm systems generally make the leap a year ahead of expectation. Perhaps the Os do better next year than anticipated. In reality, probably looking at one more year, 2023. Hitting will be there. It will depend on how the rotation comes together:
> many people think that losing is rewarded with the current system
We are in a *very* tough division. Our competitors are from bigger cities that provide much better cash to buy the top name players. We have been in the basement for a long time. We're finally starting to climb out of it. And NOW take away our shots at drafting the best young talents to complete our rebuild effort? OY!
Just lose baby.
The Orioles will be drafting in the top five for four straight years--twice as overall No. 1. That ought to be a big push to turn things around, and by the time a new rule takes effect, they're supposed to be better. If you're a good drafter, you should be able to draft well at No. 1, No. 10 and No. 30.
Rich, I am a regular reader, I like your work. I don't post much, but I strongly protest here.
> If you’re a good drafter, you should be able to draft well at No. 1, No. 10 and No. 30.
Yeah but you're gonna draft a whole lot better from the cream at the top, as opposed to the dregs at the bottom.
First of all, thank you for reading, and it's nice to hear from readers who don't normally comment. My point is that after four years of drafting, the team should be in a position where they don't need to draft in the top five to find good players. Those four years should give them a good base from which to build, and good players can be found in lower picks--and lower rounds. Trey Mancini, John Means and Cedric Mullins were all selected in lower rounds. Again, thank you for taking the time to post. Looking forward to hearing from you again.
> Trey Mancini, John Means and Cedric Mullins were all selected in lower rounds.
Good point!
---
I was trying to send 'thumbs up' ... but it wouldn't post
Rich? No answer my good questions? Eyez hurt Rich, very hurtz...
Joe, the second part is on Tuesday.
Wow…that’s bad….go O’s…
Rich, for a future Answers column I'd be interested to hear if you think there's a chance Rodriguez may pitch out of the pen when he comes up as a way to limit his innings but get valuable experience. I know that is an old school approach to bringing a future starter to the bigs, but it seems logical to me when innings limits are put into play.
Thank you, Rich for answering my question related to trading an outfielder.
I’m an avid reader of Baltimore baseball, Camden chat , and masn. I’m gonna say that you’ve really put up some good reads these past few weeks with the lock down. You guys are my first read now each morning. Keep up the good work!
Thank you, Rob.
“69 O’s start as a fan. Great job Rich with writing. When it comes to the draft why not have it start with last team to not make the playoffs gets first pick. Than use NFL style draft where a team just missing out on playoffs could trade that pick down not up and get instant roster help for next year. It would benefit small market teams who struggle to sign free agents plus it would put emphasis on teams drafting early to draft players who would provide quick turnaround and leave most likely the coveted High school players for later draft picks. It would keep fans in on the draft waiting to see about draft trades. Just a thought and again great work.
Agree, almost any system involving trades would be more interesting for baseball, have something impact tanking….go O’s…
89, baseball has resisted allowing trading of picks other than Competitive Balance Picks. I don’t see that changing.
Thank you for your kind words about the site.